Report of the Chairman; ENERGY PMP of the World Federation of Sciences
Erice, Tuesday August 23rd 2005Richard Wilson
Over the years, the Energy PMP has studied nuclear energy, both fission and fusion with varying degrees of frustration. In 2003 the PMP had a specific session in the general seminar, last year talks were only in the PMP itself, but this year the PMP again arranged a session on nuclear and renewable energy in the main seminar. There was a degree of optimism not seen for many years. Although the number of nuclear power plants under construction throughout the world is still woefully small, it seems that new power plants will soon be ordered in the USA - the first time for nearly 30 years. The site for ITER has been selected although a commercial fusion power plant is still a long way off. It seems that major public opposition will be muted. For example, Mr Patrick Moore, founder of Greenpeace testified in favor of nuclear power at a congressional hearing on April 28, 2005 with the title, "Nuclear Power Generation as an Approach to Meeting America's Energy Needs."This proposal is still embrionic. It depends, of course, on the existence of at least one individual who is interested in the detailed leg work to explore with the agencies their willingness to have WFS participation. This individual exists within the PMP and this other exploration will take place during the next six months and be presented to WFS in more detail at a later time..
International Energy Research and Development
At the PMP meeting on August 18th 2005, there was a long discussion, jointly with members of the Climate PMP on funding for energy research and development. It was pointed out that although the countries of the world are making more decisions about energy than ever before and the contribution of energy production and energy services alone to the economies of most developed countries approaches 10 percent, the expenditures on energy R and D has declined, worldwide, in real terms by a factor of 2. Risks to the economies of the developed world from the ineffective utilization of energy include, among others, potential climate change, oil supply disruptions, unstable reliability, and disease incidence costs of urban air pollution. At present the developed nations are under-investing in energy R&D relative to the economic benefits or to the value of insuring against a wide range of risks As a result of this discussion, the Energy PMP plans to make an analysis of the energy R and D a major focus for the coming year. This effort will include: understanding the total portfolios, exposing gaps, overlaps and the magnitude of the global effort, understanding trends in both the public and private sectors, and the magnitude of effort needed to meet the challenge of global energy system transitions.
RECOMMENDATIONS 1 and 2.
(1) The Energy PMP recommends that governments of all developed nations examine their R&D expenditures over a broad range of energy technologies and determine whether they are sufficient to cope with the dynamic changes taking place and the importance of energy to their economies in the long-term. They should also consider carefully what technologies they need to develop to deal with the risks related to the global utilization of energy, work closely with industry to plan to achieve this goal, and work with each other to eliminate gaps and optimize solutions.Developing Countries.
Last year the PMP was especially interested in developing countries. In the PMP itself we had talks from India and Bangladesh. Although we have had a somewhat different focus during the last year we are coming back to it. In particular this appears in the following recommendation:
PREAMBLE to Recommendation 3
Maintaining and understanding the flow of energy in the world is, more than ever before, crucial for mankind. It is central to many of man's activities. It makes an important connection with the "war on poverty" because for many centuries unavailability of fuel has been associated with poverty. Conversely making fuel available has been a part of many anti-poverty programs. The following remark on the subject is attributed to Benjamin Franklin (1786):
"In traveling, when men have neither coal nor wood nor turf, save at excessive prices, they live in miserable hovels, are ragged, and have nothing comfortable about them. But when fuel is cheap, and they have the wit to use it wisely, they are well supplied with necessaries and have decent habitations."
At the other end of the fuel chain, the use of energy often has severe environmental impacts and sustainability demands that the fuel sources not be too rapidly depleted. Any responsible energy policy must take account of all of these considerations. The Energy PMP is concerned that some policies proposed by developed nations to cope with global warming, for example, would have an adverse impact upon global anti-poverty programs proposed by the same nations. It is crucial that the poorest of the poor have a minimum of energy supply. Any such adverse impact would deepen the distrust that such poor nations often feel towards the rich ones. Accordingly the energy PMP makes the following recommendations:Next year
The present Chairman of the PMP is unable to commit himself to coming to Erice in August 2006. Accordingly Dr Klaus Lackner has agreed to be Chairman for the next year. His agreement to undertake this was met with approval and acclamation. The present chairman hopes that Klaus will be able to persuade scientists from many other countries to join in the work of the PMP so that itis not so much dominated by the USA.