Go to the Previous Page

            December Letters           
                                         

HARVARD UNIVERSITY



DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS LYMAN LABRATORY OF PHYSICS
CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02133


December 13, 1965

TO: Dr. Paul S. Russell, Oncology Committee

FROM: R. N. Kjellberg

SUBJECT: Cyclotron for Biomedical Use

An opportunity exists for taking over the Harvard Cyclotron primarily for biomedical uses. A few weeks ago, the High Energy Physics Committee of the Harvard Physics Department decided tentatively to close down the Cyclotron January, 1968. At a meeting today the same committee approved a letter to Dean Ford suggesting that the University consider the advisability of continuing the Cyclotron's operation under other than Physics Department auspices. This action reflects the committee's concern for other users of the Cyclotron, especially in the biological and clinical area. The principal condition for its continued existence in the present location

is that the University provide comparable space (3,500 square feet) with an overhead crane for the Physics Department.

Thus, the alternatives for the Cyclotron include:

1) Scrapping it.

2) Transferring it to Northeastern University for relocation. (Professor Weinstein and other members of the Northeastern Physics Department are seriously exploring the possibility of taking over the Cyclotron and relocating it. They would depend heavily on the biomedical users to justify such a plan. )

3) Transferring it to some other Harvard Department (e.g. Medical School) for relocation.

4) Keep it in present location under administration of the Medical School (above).

The Cyclotron produces 1011 protons/sec at 160 million electron volts - capable of penetrating 17 cm. in soft tissue. Dose-rates up to 100,000 rads/min are attainable in small targets (less than 1.0 cm) and up to 200 rads/min for uniform fields as large as 50 cm in diameter.

The Cyclotron currently occupies a building of about 5,000 square feet. The machine, 20' x 10' X 14' in size, weighs a bit over 700 tons.

. Our colleagues in the Physics Department have estimated that the machine could be kept in operation with annual support of about $120, 000. The following is a rough cost breakdown.


-2-

Personnel (including Administrator, Engineers, Draftsman, Secretary, Machinists, Technicians, Operators, Janitor)

$63,500

Fringe

5,080

Supplies

13,500

Major Equipment

10,000

Power and water

20,000

Miscellaneous

6,000

Total(not including overhead)

$118,080

In considering alternatives 2 and 3 above other costs would need reckoning. A new building would cost an estimated $300,000 to which equipment would be added. The estimated cost of moving the machine is in the range of $150,000 - $175,000 and would require 6 months to accomplish.

The potential users of the machine and their estimated participa­tion are as follows:


%

Share $

Neurosurg . Therapy

15 – 25


16,000-30,000


Neurosurg . Research

10

12,000

Other MGH research
(currently NA SA supported)

15

20,000

Others, including N. E. Univ.,
B. U., Tufts, U. S. A. F., NASA,
U. Mass.

25 – 40

20,000

MGH Radiation Center Rx

15 – 25

15,000 - 25, 000

The above is submitted as a basis of estimating the feasibility of a Cyclotron for biomedical use.

RNK


16 December 1967

Dear Fellow-Sponsor

It is time for me to report in more detail the plans for the cyclotron closing party on December 27. Invitations have been sent to those currently working on the cyclotron and also to a number of “alumni” who contributed substantially to the research program or to the initial construction. There are about 75 names on the list. Adding wives, and deducting a few people who will probably not attend, I estimate that there will be 120 guests. The menu -- without all the mouth-watering details -- will be as follows:

Cocktails and appetizers

Hot buffet dishes and salads

Coffee

Estimated cost is itemized below:

Invitations

$19.05

Barman

16.00

Liquor

120.00

Appetizers

40.00

Buffet (Window Shop)

254.50


449.25

I would welcome contributions towards this budget. After making allowances for the impecuniousness of graduate; students and for the enormous contribution of time and effort by Marguerite Holbrook in getting things done , I make the following suggestions for contributions

Joe Palmieri

55

Andy Koehler

55

Allan Cormack

55

Bill Preston

55

Ray Kjellberg

55

Mildred Widgoff

55

Bernie Gottschalk

55

Marguerite Holbrook

25

Sue Kannenberg

20

Bob Schneider

_20


450


Andreas M. Koehler

 Go to the Previous Page